I hear about Telemedicine often in the news and until recently had only casually glossed over the latest articles. The details I paid little attention to, but the headlines I would remember. Great for rural areas I would read! Extend physician reach to those who otherwise wouldn’t have access to a doctor! Get specialists with expertise to greater numbers of patients with rare or unique conditions!
As a nearly finished anesthesia resident, in a large city with an abundance of doctors – I didn’t think telemedicine would have much impact on my future in medicine. None of the above headlines applied. However, I would be surprised one morning to wake up to an email that roughly said: “Thank you for your service to our patients in the past, but we will now be covering your position with telemedicine doctors, effective (nearly) immediately.”
You see I’m not JUST an anesthesia resident. I also spent several shifts a month serving as an in-house night physician at two long-term acute care (LTAC) facilities of the same company. In a long standing tradition called “moonlighting” residents in training often supplement their income by working night shifts in various medical positions. In fact, this second job can be so lucrative for residents, that (at the expense of sleep) residents can sometimes double or more their resident salary. Personally, with roughly 30 days notice, what amounts to 40% of my income was terminated.
In the new system, a single physician at home with a telemedicine interface will be covering the two LTACs that each previously had a physician on site at night. Each physician was previously paid $90-100 an hour, now the single telemedicine doctor will make $25/hour per hospital. For the current two hospital system our moonlighting group was covering, this amounts to a cost savings of about 75%. Or using rough hourly wage amounts, our group was being paid ~$18,000 per week, $72,000 per month, $936,000 per year – to cover those two LTAC hospitals. The telemedicine group will be paid ~$4,800 per week, $19,200 per month, $249,600 per year to provide the same coverage. I cannot argue with the impressive financial savings that switching to telemedicine will provide for this small two hospital system. There is a third LTAC owned by the same parent company in the area, which is covered at night by a different system. They will also be eventually transitioning to telemedicine as well – making the cost savings even more dramatic.
The approach cannot be looked at any other way than a cost saving effort. There is not lack of physicians for the work, shifts were never unfilled, and frequently fought over. There are attending physicians of multiple specialties in our moonlighting group, as well as a few residents like myself training in specialities that are suited for critical care, airway management, and emergency response. The patients had no rural limitations, no particular special expertise needs, and no reason (other than what became a financial decision) that they couldn’t have access to a 24/7 in-house physician.
What kind of patients were we caring for? A great variety actually. Most made up of post surgical or intensive care patients requiring long-term IV antibiotics or rehabilitation that were too medically complex for a less acute rehabilitation center or skilled nursing facility. Admittedly, most of these patients do not need to be seen by a physician at night. But the 8 bed “ICU” unit at one of hospitals we covered was nearly always full as well – patients requiring a full range of intensive care needs from ventilator management to vasopressor support. And not entirely infrequently, our group was called in the middle of the night to run codes, intubate patients in respiratory failure, or place central and arterial lines. Despite our best efforts, sometimes patients died at night under our care.
Can telemedicine do all of that? Yes, and no. I must admit, in the last year I worked there I personally never had a situation arise during a shift that a telemedicine doctor/interface probably wouldn’t have been able to handle. The number of times I had to physically see a patient in the middle of the night (as opposed to the usual telephone calls for various small issues) was very small – and usually responding to falls. However, I was a bit of a “white cloud” in my group and while still rare, other members did have significant experiences requiring hands on skill to potentially save lives. Going forward, many of those tasks in emergencies will be handled by nursing or technical staff. Airways, including intubations, will be handled by Respiratory. Central and arterial lines will wait in until the morning. Codes will be run by the charge nurse, with telemedicine hopefully set up in time to assist with general direction.
In one example, during the small window where both telemedicine was being used as the primary night coverage and there were still an in-house physician as back-up, a night physician was forced to intervene. A patient with impending respiratory failure was struggling on Bipap, and the decision was made via Telemedicine for respiratory to intubate. The night physician, trying to allow the telemedicine and RT to manage the situation, was only standing by and did not intervene…. until oxygen saturations went below 50% during the intubation attempt. That night the in-house physician likely saved that patients life (at least for another day).
How many times would a similar situation come up per year? It’s hard to say, but I’d guess about one every month or two. That’s a small number, unless of course you are that patient in need. But I’ll admit I have no idea if we are really “saving” any of those patients, as the mortality of requiring a significant intervention when already sick enough to require LTAC care is likely very high.
It brings the telemedicine movement forward as part of the bigger issue of cost saving in medicine. At some point we cannot continue to spend every dollar all the time to save every patient, especially when there may be little long-term benefit. In our case, I have to admit I see the move as justified, even if my own pocket book takes a painful hit. The question will be where the line is drawn, as the proliferation of telemedicine continues. How many lives are worth saving with the added expense of physicians in person? Could telemedicine even replace the more permanent day physicians at locations like these? Surely not.. But I never thought I’d lose my own job to telemedicine either.
What do you think of telemedicine? Are there places it is a good option? Is this situation described one of them? Give us your thoughts in the comments.
Lawrence B. Keller, CFP at Physician Financial Services:
Lawrence B. Keller, CFP®, CLU®, ChFC®, RHU®, LUTCF has been in the insurance and financial services industry since 1990. Unlike medicine, which has a standardized path that physicians must take to gain the education, training and experience requirements necessary to obtain board certification, the insurance and financial services industry does not. Working with an agent that is familiar with the underwriting of both disability and life insurance policies for physicians can all but guarantee a smooth underwriting process in which the desired outcome is likely. While he might not be a doctor’s first phone call regarding their insurance needs, he is often their last. www.physicianfinancialservices.com
Check out the other great companies that help sponsor our page here: #LifeofaMedStudent Recommended Sponsors
Disclosure: PFS is a paid sponsor of #LifeofaMedStudent and has a financial relationship with the site.